Showing posts with label Intervention rates. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Intervention rates. Show all posts

Thursday, June 23, 2011

A Look at the Research: The Link Between Epidural Analgesia and Breastfeeding

Science & sensibility by Lamaze is bringing us a review of latest research on use of epidural analgesia with possible link to breastfeeding difficulties after the delivery. 

It’s probably fair to say that most women who decide to have an epidural during labor don’t consider its possible impact on breastfeeding. Perhaps this is because no thought is given generally to any possible links between drugs and breastfeeding success (or otherwise). Instead, both pregnant (or laboring) women and caregivers usually assume that breastfeeding is a separate issue. Evidence from early research certainly doesn’t seem to support that view and a little common sense would also lead us to challenge it further…

Sunday, June 12, 2011

C-section not best option for breech birth (Research)

The Globe and mail informs us about a new guidelines for birthing breech positioned baby.


Physicians should no longer automatically opt to perform a cesarean section in the case of a breech birth, according to new guidelines by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada.
Released yesterday, the guidelines are a response to new evidence that shows many women are safely able to vaginally deliver babies who enter the birth canal with the buttocks or feet first. Normally, the infant descends head first.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

More Interventions at Delivery Not Linked to Healthier Newborns

Medical Center of University of Rochester released press statement April 13, 2011 :
" High Rates of Induction, Primary C-Section Do Not Improve Infant Outcomes in Low-Risk Women at Community Hospitals" 
based on the result of the study which was funded by the University of Rochester Medical Center and the New York State Department of Health, conducted by Chriptopher Glanz, M.D., M.P.H.


The study was trying to determine connections between interventions during the labour and their effect on the health of the newborn baby.
" The finding that rates of intervention at delivery – whether high, low, or in the middle – had no bearing on the health of new babies brings into question the skyrocketing number of both inductions and cesarean deliveries in the United States."